 |
|
 |
Firearms |
 |
|
Author |
Message |
PO Info |
 |
reaper I miss you Shar

Gender:  Joined: 28 Dec 2002 |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:17 am Post subject: |
Faye wrote: |
I would also like to point out that "guns dont kill people, people kill people" Last time I checked there weren't guns flying around shooting people by themselves. |
No offence here but I am with Scrummy this is one of the most ignorant sayings ever conceived.
Ok let’s trace the death of a person by gun. The trigger is pulled this action causes the hammer to release and strike the ignition point. The primary charge then lights and the bullet leaves the barrel with an average velocity of anywhere from 1000-4000 feet per second. If said projectile then strikes a human being depending on type of the bullet will most likely rip a hole completely through flesh bone and all..Or sometimes it will fragment inside the body causing multiple small wounds and ultimately infection if lucky enough to survive. Oh and lets not forget that any higher caliber round will leave an exit wound at least 10X bigger that its entry wound.
Now call me crazy but that sounds like the gun is doing 99% of the killing. Now yes a gun is not going to up and shot someone on its own, But it is still the enabling force that allows us human beings to kill with such marvelous ease, and also give us the distance from the act that we all love that makes it so much more psychologically bearable.....yes thank god for that
Now onto the point of concealed carry
sicne u and blackmage both agreed i'll just jump on u again to make this easier to compose
Faye wrote: | Any schmuck without a record can own a hand gun. You have to go through a course to get a concealed handgun liscense but my mother and I have both been through it and it really wasnt anything special. |
Faye wrote: |
Blackmage has another excellent point. If criminals really gotta think twice about doing shit now days, you never know who's packin a concealed weapon. To be perfectly honest, if the need ever arose, I'd hate to be caught without mine.
|
Yes any schmuck as u put it...and we never know which one of these "shmucks" has the capacity to end life with the twitch of a finger. OH BOY! So yeah there could be crimes prevented, and I am sure there are and will be crimes prevented by concealed carry. But I also know there will be just as many deaths cause by concealed carry, probably more, than they prevent. Every heard of the term Crime Of Passion called so because a person becomes so enraged or distraught by some stimulus that they react in a extremely violent way, and as I have said what better thing to have directly in hand in such a situation than an object that can kill with only slight pressure needed of one finger....But we don't have to worry about that cause guns don't kill people right
Also another problem would BE vigilantism. Ok so an armed offence is taking place, and I am there when it happens. Ok first its shitty enough I have one ass hole with a gun committing a crime. Now I have some "shmuck" with a gun that wants to be John McClane or whatever try and do something. So yes the person with the gun who steps up COULD stop the crime. Then again he could startle the perp into opening fire, which could easily wound or kill innocent people. And mostly likely upon being fired upon our "Joe hero USA" would most likely return fire, which again could easily kill or wound innocent people. Or our would be hero could simply open fire without warning again probably wounding or killing somebody.
Kei wrote: | I don't own guns, just swords |
Oddly enough this leads to my closer. Now swords are cool don't get me wrong lol. But honestly I think a sword is one of the most grotesque things ever created. Have u ever sat down and asked yourself what a sword is made for? An Axe can be used for killing a human, and axe can be used for logging. A spear can be used for killing a human, a Spear can be used for hunting. A knife can be used for Killing a human, a knife can be used for eating, skinning, ect.
A sword however has one singular functional use, the killing and maiming of human beings in the most efficient way possible by hand, in fact that is what a sword was designed to do from square one, Kill a human being that’s it...And that kids is why swords are grotesque
Ok with that said I know I seem to come down on guns very harshly. But believe it or not I am not against guns all together. They are a useful and indeed necessary I think. I am however against the monstrosities that have been designed with the singular goal of ending human life.
That is why I am so against concealed carry partly (since it deals with handguns). A hand guns were designed to kill humans. They are highly inaccurate at long ranges, and have very limited stopping power to an animal. Making them useless for hunting (excluding the .44 magnum ). Don't believe me pick up your lil 9mm or .22 and go bear hunting I dare you
However hand guns are quite effective at ending the life of a human being, mostly because thats what they were designed to do. And That makes them barbaric to me.
I also put your assault weapons and SMG's in this category of barbarism, because they were also designed to end human life nothing else.
See what happens when u don't let me debate for so long  |
_________________ All religion is a defense against a religious experience - Carl Jung
The power of philosophy floats through my head, light like a feather, heavy as lead - Bob Marley
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that refuse military service - Albert Einstein |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 151 - Losses 189 Level 22 |
EXP: 7585 HP: 2600
 |
STR: 1000 END: 800 ACC: 1550 AGI: 1250
|
(Blades) (450 - 680) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kei 巡る 時 屁と 輝き 進もう

Gender:  Joined: 18 Oct 2004 |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:38 am Post subject: |
Quote: |
Oddly enough this leads to my closer. Now swords are cool don't get me wrong lol. But honestly I think a sword is one of the most grotesque things ever created. Have u ever sat down and asked yourself what a sword is made for? An Axe can be used for killing a human, and axe can be used for logging. A spear can be used for killing a human, a Spear can be used for hunting. A knife can be used for Killing a human, a knife can be used for eating, skinning, ect.
A sword however has one singular functional use, the killing and maiming of human beings in the most efficient way possible by hand, in fact that is what a sword was designed to do from square one, Kill a human being that’s it...And that kids is why swords are grotesque
|
I know what a sword is made of i'm studying blacksmithing. If you think about it that way yes, it does sound grotesque but, however that way of thinking I believe is wrong, a lot of hard work goes into making katanas, as with any sword. sometimes it takes longer and harder than you would think to make one, the feeling of having something hand crafted that you did yourself. Many blacksmiths slave over extremely hot fires and coals a day, making these beautiful peices. It would be immoral to underapreciate them. They put thier heart and souls into making these swords, as for the killing of humans, I highly disagree with that. How were you susposed to defend yourselves back in that time piriod, swords were the only things being made.
And a Samurai never un-sheets his sword for nothing more than self defence or a highly logical cause. It is not the sword that does the killing, it is the person, swinging it. That is why anyone who is highly un-stable or un-diciplined shouldn't own one. You have to be highly diciplined and emtionaly stable to handle this weapon. take me sirious when I say these words. Sorry if I'm coming down rather hard, but in all reality no weapon is made for killing they are made for selfdefence. |
_________________ "In this world there are no coincidences, there is only inevitability."
Last edited by kei on Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:13 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 83 - Losses 79 Level 16 |
EXP: 13860 HP: 2580
 |
STR: 780 END: 900 ACC: 1100 AGI: 1220
|
Wandabastyle Katana (Sword) (390 - 560) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shino Fade into this fantasy, caught in the web of time

Age: 49 Gender:  Joined: 15 Sep 2002 |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:46 am Post subject: |
Wow... This is a good conversation.
You all make good valid points.
I'm really not sure where I stand on this.
I will say this...
In GA, there is a city (Kennesaw I think) where there is a local ordanance that REQUIRES that all households own a gun.
Wouldn't you know it, it has the lowest crime rate in the state.
Hell, would YOU break into a house if you knew that it was a law that there be a gun inside. I sure as hell wouldn't. Of course, I wouldn't break into a house anyway... but you get my drift. |
_________________ So many games... so little time
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 190 - Losses 169 Level 21 |
EXP: 11590 HP: 3150
 |
STR: 1050 END: 1050 ACC: 1200 AGI: 1200
|
Bianco & Nero (Sabers) (500 - 600) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ultrawolf Mr. Roarke

Gender:  Joined: 04 Jul 2003 |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:00 am Post subject: |
How do y'all feel about Gun Licensing?
Yes, more restrictions on Firearms but hear me out.
I had a thought, aside from a clean record, in order to own a gun you might have to go to a training program/class much like the way you can take Driver's Ed before you can drive only it's a requirement. You have to take a class specifically for that class of firearm, including tests, etc. If the teacher determines you are unfit to possess a firearm, you're dropped.
I'm not sure what it would accomplish, but it's an idea.
Another idea is registering bullets.
Bullets could be IDed and everytime you purchase bullets the serial tag of the bullets are scanned into your Gun License so they can be backtracked to you. Now as said before, there -is- an underground market and no doubt, IDless bullets will be sold along with illegal firearms. Sooner or later however the IDless bullet supply should run dry right? Although I'm sure someone will think of making underground bullets. But it's more an idea to deterr and scare people away from doing something stupid.
I'm not up to date on the latest in safety locks, but do they have thumb scanners for guns now? So that only the person registered to that thumb lock can fire the gun? If not, maybe that's something that ought to be looked into. I don't think more or less guns on the street will solve anything, if anything I think the issue ought to be tackled from an unorthadox perspective. |
_________________ Welcome... |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 115 - Losses 130 Level 17 |
EXP: 831 HP: 2800
 |
STR: 1000 END: 900 ACC: 1100 AGI: 1000
|
Legacy (Shotgun) (400 - 550) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Faye Luna Sierra

Age: 42 Gender:  Joined: 28 Apr 2004 |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:51 am Post subject: |
This is where you are wrong Reaper. Gun isnt doing any of the killing. It still takes a person, a very disturbed person, but a person none the less, to load the gun, chamber the bullet, aim and pull the trigger. That person is doing the killing not the gun. Saying the "Guns" kill people is just like saying the video games cause all the school shootings. No one wants to blame the person, just the inanimate object in their hand, or sitting in their living room hooked up to their TV. A gun was made to shoot, and it was made to be accurate. But it takes a Human being to use that gun to kill someone else.
As far as making it easier to kill someone.... yeah, I've agreed with that. However, it wouldnt be terribly more difficult for me to stab, beat, or choke someone to death. Think about it, the PO community aside, how many people do you know that could actually defend themselves against a knife attack or a good beating with a lead pipe. All the guns do is make the attacks less personal. |
_________________
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 39 - Losses 23 Level 9 |
EXP: 3781 HP: 2140
 |
STR: 710 END: 715 ACC: 1100 AGI: 775
|
Neverdawn (Gun) (340 - 400) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Andsectoid Router Monkey of DOOM!!!

Gender:  Joined: 18 Sep 2003 |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 27 - Losses 27 Level 8 |
EXP: 312 HP: 2300
 |
STR: 800 END: 750 ACC: 750 AGI: 900
|
Forearm Blades of Death (Blades) (270 - 440) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shino Fade into this fantasy, caught in the web of time

Age: 49 Gender:  Joined: 15 Sep 2002 |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 12:05 pm Post subject: |
Faye wrote: | This is where you are wrong Reaper. Gun isnt doing any of the killing. It still takes a person, a very disturbed person, but a person none the less, to load the gun, chamber the bullet, aim and pull the trigger. That person is doing the killing not the gun. Saying the "Guns" kill people is just like saying the video games cause all the school shootings. No one wants to blame the person, just the inanimate object in their hand, or sitting in their living room hooked up to their TV. A gun was made to shoot, and it was made to be accurate. But it takes a Human being to use that gun to kill someone else.
As far as making it easier to kill someone.... yeah, I've agreed with that. However, it wouldnt be terribly more difficult for me to stab, beat, or choke someone to death. Think about it, the PO community aside, how many people do you know that could actually defend themselves against a knife attack or a good beating with a lead pipe. All the guns do is make the attacks less personal. |
I'll make my comment on this...
I think you are both right and wrong at the same time.
Guns DO kill people, but NOT WITHOUT the help of a person.
Faye, I agree that you it wouldn't be much harder to stab someone to death, but beat and/or chock... that would be much harder in many cases.
For the record, I would be much more afraid of someone with a knife to my throat, than I would someone with a gun to my head. |
_________________ So many games... so little time
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 190 - Losses 169 Level 21 |
EXP: 11590 HP: 3150
 |
STR: 1050 END: 1050 ACC: 1200 AGI: 1200
|
Bianco & Nero (Sabers) (500 - 600) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kei 巡る 時 屁と 輝き 進もう

Gender:  Joined: 18 Oct 2004 |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:28 pm Post subject: |
-Anything can be considered a weapon, your body if trained at any point can become a lethal weapon. You can snap a mans neck just as fast as you can shoot him in the head or slice his thraot. Shino makes a good point, Guns are in many cases the cause of some deaths, but also like faye stated, a gun is just a peice of metal unless used. There for it takes a person to Kill a person. It takes one thought, a nod of a head, and the pull of a trigger to kill someone.
As for The idea Ultra I think that's an awesome idea, but the thing is noone really knows, if this will happen perhaps we sohuld write a potittion. |
_________________ "In this world there are no coincidences, there is only inevitability." |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 83 - Losses 79 Level 16 |
EXP: 13860 HP: 2580
 |
STR: 780 END: 900 ACC: 1100 AGI: 1220
|
Wandabastyle Katana (Sword) (390 - 560) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ScrumYummy bunnyhunches of scrums

Gender:  Joined: 29 Jun 2005 |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:48 pm Post subject: |
Faye wrote: | Scrummy, no offence but lets try to avoid quoting comedians on topics like this. I am sure we all love Eddie Izzard, but it is hardly worthwhile to quote something he talked about for 30 seconds in one of his bits. Contrary to popular belief its not always as simple as point and shoot.
You are right though I did mix up my shootings. The Columbine kids actually got a fellow stundent to buy their firearms for them, 3 days prior to the shooting. I dont think they figured out where they got the Tec-DC9 from though.
On the topic of hunting, I actually bow hunt as well. Taking a deer with a bow is a lot more satisfying, I will admit. However I dont consider it any less sportsman like that taking one with a gun. The only thing I dont like about most hunters is the fact that they are lazy about it. Sitting in a box or a tree for hours on end just waiting for a deer to show up. I prefer stalking. It makes the hunt so much more fun. |
Sorry. I was trying not too make everything too heavy. ^^; Gomen.
*bows* I would just like to say, I find you very honorable as a hunter. I just wish that there were more like you.
Shino wrote: | In GA, there is a city (Kennesaw I think) where there is a local ordanance that REQUIRES that all households own a gun.
Wouldn't you know it, it has the lowest crime rate in the state.
|
I know it seems like I mention Portland a lot on the boards, but hey, I really love this place Anyway, for a major city, Portland has one of the lowest crime rates in the country, and hardly anyone here owns a gun. It's very leftist here. And there are a lot of hippies.
Anyway, I don't it's fare to use an example that's extremely one way or the other on the issue as a standard for a comparison. So while I find Kennesaw, GA to be a fascinating oddity, I don't think that putting a gun in every household will solve all of our problems =)
Ultrawolf wrote: | Another idea is registering bullets.
Bullets could be IDed and everytime you purchase bullets the serial tag of the bullets are scanned into your Gun License so they can be backtracked to you. Now as said before, there -is- an underground market and no doubt, IDless bullets will be sold along with illegal firearms. Sooner or later however the IDless bullet supply should run dry right? Although I'm sure someone will think of making underground bullets. But it's more an idea to deterr and scare people away from doing something stupid. |
That's an excellent idea. As was having to get a gun through a registration class. However, stupid people are going to be stupid. If Daddy leaves his gunrack unlocked, for ignorance or naïvité or whatever, little Billy can still hijack his high-powered rifle. Or Mr Thug can still break into his home and take it. Mr Thug can still purchase one from a trunk in a back alley.
Now, don't get me wrong. I think having stronger restrictions would be better than nothing. I still believe, though, that eradtication would be for the best.
Faye wrote: | As far as making it easier to kill someone.... yeah, I've agreed with that. However, it wouldnt be terribly more difficult for me to stab, beat, or choke someone to death. Think about it, the PO community aside, how many people do you know that could actually defend themselves against a knife attack or a good beating with a lead pipe. All the guns do is make the attacks less personal. |
Yes, but you can't "accidentally" beat someone to death with a lead pipe. It is highly unlikely that "oh whoops, I didn't mean to stab them to death, I just wanted to scare them with the knife."
I'm not naïve enough to believe that getting rid of guns would abolish all violent crime, or make the streets 100% safe. Getting rid of guns, though, that would take all "accidents" out of the crime. And I honestly think that people, in general, are too lazy to beat someone to death with a lead pipe, particularly if they were just trying to steal their wallet.
Shino wrote: | Guns DO kill people, but NOT WITHOUT the help of a person.
Faye, I agree that you it wouldn't be much harder to stab someone to death, but beat and/or chock... that would be much harder in many cases. |
Best way that could have been said.
And I agree with Shino...if you think that anyone can just beat/choke anyone else to death, I think you are underestimating the victim and overestimating the criminal. Personally, I could never kill someone with my bare hands--not just because of my morality, but because of the physical impossibility of it. I am 5'4 and weigh 105. Give me a gun, though, and I become much more dangerous.
Kei wrote: | -Anything can be considered a weapon, your body if trained at any point can become a lethal weapon. You can snap a mans neck just as fast as you can shoot him in the head or slice his thraot. Shino makes a good point, Guns are in many cases the cause of some deaths, but also like faye stated, a gun is just a peice of metal unless used. There for it takes a person to Kill a person. It takes one thought, a nod of a head, and the pull of a trigger to kill someone. |
It takes months, years even, to become an efficient killer with your bare hands. With a gun, all it takes is a bullet. Now, I'm not saying that just anyone can pick up a gun and immediately know how to turn the safety off and exactly how to aim and shoot, but if it wasn't so easy, you wouldn't hear about these accidental shootings in the home, and you wouldn't have these dumb**ses running around on the streets thinking "Gee golly, I'm a bad**s because I got a gun! Look! I can point it at someone and they get scared out of their wits! Oh whoops, I accidentally pulled the trigger and killed a three-year-old. Oh well, it was an accident. They'll never catch me."
Again, I'm not saying that getting rid of guns = getting rid of crime. But I think it would be a major step towards improving our society. |
_________________ -Scrum-
..it borked. :D |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 23 - Losses 22 Level 7 |
EXP: 2313 HP: 2241
 |
STR: 779 END: 731 ACC: 795 AGI: 795
|
Totem Doll (Sword) (320 - 360) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ultrawolf Mr. Roarke

Gender:  Joined: 04 Jul 2003 |
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:55 pm Post subject: |
I think a big problem is escalation.
In England (I think) the police officers don't actually carry guns, and they have far less gun problems than we do. I -think- there's an issue of escalation as far as firearms are concerned. Figure that Johnny Hoodlum will want to carry a gun for protection from other people carrying guns. Police Officers have to deal with escalation constantly. Officers carry handguns, Criminals carry Assault Rifles, Officers start wearing Body Armor, Criminals start using armor piercing rounds, and so on. It's a tricky subject to deal with I think because the reaction to policies or decisions might backfire and cause more problems. |
_________________ Welcome... |
|
|
 |
 |
Wins 115 - Losses 130 Level 17 |
EXP: 831 HP: 2800
 |
STR: 1000 END: 900 ACC: 1100 AGI: 1000
|
Legacy (Shotgun) (400 - 550) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|