Holy God, I'm in love

[Therin]

If Darth Vader were a watch, he would look like this.
*drools*

As a side note:

This is what you should get me for christmas.

^_^

[Tobias]

while i think the watch is teh sexeh, im not a fan of the sunglasses with the earphones...if you really need the music that bad, they shoudl be in an ipod or other portable device...not in eyewear.

Let us determine this: Eye-wear is for eyes.
Sound-wear is for ears.

both shouldnt be intertwined...i dont want hearing aids from oakley, nor do i want sunglasses from sony

*explodes*

[Buda]

$650!!!

*explodes*

thats a nice looking watch, but hell to-the-mother-friking no.

[GAAZ]

The watch is only $650 because it has an Oakley stamp..Very Useless.

Go for REAL style and get a Fossil watch.

Like these
Clone Wars
Color Change Vader

[Ming]

That watch is pretty HAWT. But I don't believe in spending $650 for a watch. If I'm going to buy an expensive watch, I figure I might as well bite the bullet, spend over a grand on it, and buy myself a Breitling. But seeing as how I can't afford to do that right now, my cell phone will more than suffice as a time piece.

And I pretty much agree with Tobs on the Oakley mp3 player glasses. For the price that they charge for those, I want WAAAY more than "up to 1 gig" of space. For the price you pay for those, you can buy yourself a 5 gig Zen Micro or iPod Mini, a nice pair of glasses, and still have money left over.

BTW, did you know that Oakley is also making a line of glasses that have built in Bluetooth so that you can use them as a cell phone head set? Riiiiight.....

[Senkir]

I'll stick to my little Skagen flat-style watch. Hasn't done me wrong yet.

\o_o\

/o_o/

[ScrumYummy]

Let's see....a 1g Mp3player/eyewear for $650...or a 60g iPod for $400.

Tough call. X)!